Rep. James Comer makes a joke about how the Biden White House will face “judgment day” after the release of financial information

President Biden will have a “judgment day” on Wednesday, according to House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, when his panel reveals bank records that allegedly reveal “wire transfers from adversaries around the world” going to the president’s family.

The Kentucky Republican hinted on Fox News’ “Jesse Watters Primetime” on Tuesday that the American people would see actual bank records on Wednesday showing wire transfers from rivals around the globe into a web of LLCs that were owned or controlled by the Bidens and then into the family accounts.

Tomorrow we’ll find out if Joe Biden was telling the truth when he declared his family never got any money from China. We’ll find out tomorrow whether Joe Biden was aware of his family’s business operations, despite the fact that he has previously said that he wasn’t. Therefore, in my opinion, tomorrow will serve as the Biden White House and administration’s day of reckoning.

Comer will release a letter on the state of the GOP-led inquiry into the 80-year-old president’s involvement in his family’s overseas income on Wednesday.

The findings from four bank subpoenas filed by the House Oversight Committee are anticipated to be covered in the memo, along with an explanation of how money from foreign nationals was transferred to members of the Biden family, in a presentation by Comer scheduled for Wednesday morning.

The next steps in the probe by his group are also anticipated to be disclosed by the congressman.

The banks filed suspicious activity reports with the Treasury Department because, according to Comer on Tuesday, they were aware that the financial transactions that will be made public on Wednesday weren’t “normal business activity.”

Along with it, he compared the transactions his committee discovered to the work of a “organized crime unit.”

The Bidens deliberately made this as challenging as they could. To make it as challenging as possible to both deceive the IRS and track down the sender, according to Comer, was the goal.

“And they didn’t make transfers to the Biden families directly; instead, they would make transfers from one LLC to another LLC before making wire transfers to one Biden and the Biden’s LLC. Even though I’ve worked in banking for a while, I’ve never noticed this kind of action. They were undoubtedly trying to protect “the big guy,” and they were obviously trying to hide the source of the money, he said.

The chairman of the Oversight Committee said that although he hasn’t yet figured out what “credible business” the Biden family was operating, it seemed to him that “the businesses were shell companies — set up to launder money from foreign nationals into the Biden family’s back pocket.”

Comer has also given the FBI until noon to disclose an informant dossier that purportedly contains allegations that Biden accepted bribes while vice president.

Former federal prosecutor Bud Cummins first brought the bribery allegations to the attention of then-US Attorney Geoffrey Berman in an email on October 4, 2018, in which he claimed to have information from witnesses that Biden had “exercised influence to protect” his son’s Ukrainian employer “in exchange for payments to Hunter Biden, Devon Archer, and Joe Biden.”

Yuriy Lutsenko, the former prosecutor general of Ukraine, reportedly had “hard evidence” at his disposal, including ledgers pertaining to “money transfers, money laundering,” and “eyewitnesses who were part of the transactions,” according to Cummins, who revealed this to Watters on Tuesday.

“They allegedly had eye witnesses who would claim that they were directed by Obama administration officials to tamper or alter some evidence related to Paul Manafort,” said Cummins to Watters.

Cummins claimed he “chose to drop it” after hearing nothing back from Justice Department representatives, but he recently learned that Apple was served with a subpoena for his information by the US Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York in 2019.

Cummins said, “It seems kind of perverse to me to only investigate me and turn a blind eye to potential evidence of some fairly serious stuff — bribery, even I guess you could call it treason.” Cummins added that he believes his report was disregarded because of a “highly politicized DOJ and a highly politicized FBI.”